The Missing Scientist and the Illegal Plutonium Deal

0:00 Why are we giving plutonium to the OWNERS OF AI? WHAT THE HELL? I actually want to talk about the Leaf Files and the reporting that she did yesterday that was just incredible. And I just got to say, off the rip, a lot of what I'm talking about here today is coming directly from the Leah Files. Go follow her. Go check her out. But her reporting, she's the only person reporting on this. And her reporting, when I looked at it, it solidified in my mind an idea of something that I had been talking about for weeks. Okay, for weeks and weeks. Let's see, when was this? April 24th, I put this out. So

0:46 that was 5 weeks ago. I said I strongly believe that if if there is a conspiracy around these missing or dead scientists, these three names will be found to be part of the growing list of scientists particularly Charles F. McMillan, Dr. Philip William Leonard and the other person is uh was William Bill Deninger. Now, I've actually expanded that to include various other people. And if you go to who killedthescientist.com and you go to the candidates section, these are the people that I'm talking about, particularly these two people. And I've been talking about them since at least

1:32 April 24th. And that's not because I'm some soothsayer. It's not that. I just looked at patterns and I analyzed and we found more scientists that kind of fit in. And two of these scientists together in conjunction with some of the other scientists that we will agree are part of whatever conspiracy if there is one. But these two were around nuclear weapons. And in one of my first live streams about this, I had said something to the effect that it's really interesting that Charles McMillan, who by all accounts is like the central most highest figure in the United States nuclear program, right? The US nuclear program or anything having to do with

2:18 plutonium, plutonium production in the United States. And I had said something along the lines that this guy is gone, these other nuclear scientists are gone. And all of a sudden, Trump feels emboldened enough to threaten nuclear war on Iran. As the first time a president has felt like they could do that since the Cold War, that should be alarming to people. Are you alarmed by that? Because I'm pretty alarmed by that. And I just thought it's interesting that this key figure is gone when he decides he's safe enough to do that. But Leah, oh ho ho, she bridged the gap for me. She did with this great piece that she put on Substack called, "What do weapons create plutonium?

3:04 Private companies and the dead missing nuclear scientists have in common." I'll give you a clue. It's not good. And we are not going to read all of this. Okay. I implore you to go to Leah's Substack, go follow her on X, the Leah Files. She's awesome. Leah Files. She put out this image and I saw that and I was like, whoa. And then I actually asked her, I said, "Do you mind if I put this on our on my website because I think that there's something here and I I need it represented. Of course, I'm going to credit you." She said, "Of course." So now there is a plutonium network complete with my mind maps. You know how

3:50 they go. It's pretty awesome. But I've taken all of her work here and put it up there on the site and you should go check it out. And it's also linked to her Substack, which again, you should go read this because this is the story. Okay, this is the story. And the story, well, it's frightening and it's also insane. Leah did a a great short video. We're gonna watch that together to kind of get a little bit of context before we really start diving in. But I got to tell you, I am hyped on this. And of course, a lot of you know that lately I've been talking about TESCREAL and all of the Silicon Valley cults and the AI deathbrer that's going to kill

4:35 us all. And I trust me, there's a lot more to go into that on that story. But man, I was so blown away by this work yesterday. I just had I just knew that I needed to spend the day really researching this, really going through it. And I was up late last night doing that because I knew I needed to to get back into the story, at least for this show today. You never know. And I've said from the beginning, uh, well, not really from the beginning, but from like early, maybe my second or third live stream, I said that if there's a conspiracy, this is actually like maybe two or three different conspiracies. And you know this because I went through the first thread that I think is anti-gravity, but then I've always been saying that these other guys, this

5:21 McMillan and what I'm seeing around nuclear, that is I think a whole other that's a whole other uh thread. That's a whole other sector, right? So, I think we're just seeing data missing scientists and we're just kind of gathering all all of them up and people are looking at it to be one cohesive story and I don't think it is. I think it's two or three potentially. One being anti-gravity, the other being nuclear. Beyond that, I have no idea. I can't even speculate if it's foreign or domestic or top to bottom. Who knows? And this is why, well, one of the reasons why who killed thecientist.com

6:07 exists because I still don't know where the official tally of who and what scientists and how many. There is no singular place. And I'm not saying that who killed the scientist.com is that place. But it's the only place where we're also investigating all these other things, all these other people. I've identified potentially eight more people, four or five that are like really strong cases, better stronger cases than probably three or four of the scientists that everybody recognizes as being part of the scientist. Some people still call it 10, 11, 12. I mean, we've identified publicly 16. With my four to five, we're looking at 2021, maybe even

6:53 up to 26 different scientists. Are they all part of the same conspiracy? I don't think so. I can clearly see two sectors of conspiracy, a potential third, and then I see some stragglers that kind of fit in because they're scientists that went dead or missing. And then we got to also think about the fact that some of these people aren't even scientists. Like David Wilcox wasn't a scientist. General Neil McCassland wasn't a scientist either. He was a central figure from the military. He's not Dr. Neil McClassland. He is General Neil McCassland. Part of the reason why this website exists is because we want to look at all these different people

7:38 because if we did have some sort of place that was sort of actually looking at the story and trying to make sense of it like I'm trying to do with this website, you would have she would have seen all of these people and probably because she's an incredible investigator herself, she would have seen this and drawn the same lines I'm drawing today. It's just that I've been focusing on this and have been trying to figure out how this intersects. How does this person, how do these people intersect? And when Leah put her work out, I said, "Man, that's the thread." So, Charles F. McMillan was the 10th director, that's head honcho of the Los Alamos National

8:24 Laboratory. He didn't work there. He ran the place. Okay? He was a nuclear physicist. So, Los Alamos is the same lab where Chavez and Casius would later vanish vanish. 23 years at Lawrence Livermore, which some of those years overlapped with some of the other uh missing and dead scientists. 18 years at Los Alamos, including six as director, overseeing the US nuclear deterrent. He was still actively consulting for Los Alamos and serving on Sandia Labs review committee. And if you watched the intro video be this this reporter was uh making the case for another scientist that should be put

9:09 onto the list. And I will be updating uh our list. I'm I'm just I haven't yet because I'm seriously considering putting Charles and uh William Leonard and I I'm seriously com I'm seriously considering putting them up there because I don't think we should be thinking of this separately and I'm just going to kind of take the reins on that. I am not even showing you the page here. I'm such an amateur sometimes. Sorry about that guys. Trying to be more professional. So anyway, he was still actively consulting for Los Alamos and serving on Sandia Lab's review committees when he was killed in an unexplained head-on crash on the road leading to the lab. And I've talked about this uh numerous times that Los Alamos, so if you don't know Los Alamos,

9:56 if you've seen Oppenheimer, that movie where they kind of built a town to create the nuclear bombs, right? Well, that is a scientist. Uh, it's a lab, but it's also like a military installation. It's I mean, that's where the Manhattan Project was, right? So, it's it's basically like the lineage of the Manhattan Project and it's this massive scientific building where like thousands of people work, but there's only one road in and out of it. And a ton of scientists have died on this road. and how he died on that road is very interesting. Let me see here. He was killed at 5:16 a.m. on the road leading directly into Los Alamos National Lab. The driver said she did not remember

10:44 what caused her to cross the center line. No cause was ever established. The DA found insufficient evidence for vehicular homicide. Convicted of three petty misdemeanors only. He died exactly 9 months before Chavez vanished from the same area. And that's pretty crazy. You just you have no recollection, no clue, no memory whatsoever. Wasn't he with his wife? Yes, he was with his wife. His wife survived. But I mean, not to sound super tinfoil because there is precedence here. We could be talking about directed energy weapons, things that scramble your brain. I mean, we know these technologies exist. Our government is has admitted to such. This woman just

11:31 randomly, no recollection, no memory, no nothing. Memory goes blank. She swerves, kills this guy. And then all of the police and all the detectives, they just go, "Yeah, there's nothing here, Matt. This is normal." I mean, come on. It's got to be something. It's got to be something. Just this person just just blanks out. just blips and kills a man on the other side of the road. Come on. Come on. So, this guy, Charles McMillan, trying to see here, but essentially, and and I and I have another report that we're going to go over, but when all was said and done, Charles McMillan became the centralmost person within our nuclear system, right? Our nuclear program. If our nuclear

12:16 program is spread out across different institutions and places and you know things, he was the person that oversaw it all. He was the most important person when it comes to this. But before we get into that, I want to look at Dr. Philip William Leonard. Okay, he was a high explosive synthesis chemist also at Los Alamos. He had a PhD in organic chemistry from US UC Berkeley and 48 published papers. When you have north of 40 papers, you're a badass, dude. So since 2009, he was a chemist at Lannel or Los Alamos. All right. Designing and synthesizing the explosive components

13:02 used in nuclear weapons triggers. He had a posttock at Lawrence Liverour just like Charles McMillan. He was much younger and at this time they go off. The vibes are a little bit vibeier now. So, you know, we're vibing a little bit. So, anyway, he worked at Lannel with the designing the triggers for these nuclear weapons. Okay. He also died in a crash on the same road that McMillan died and a ton of other scientists. Okay. The crash investigation. Police awaiting crash team report and medical records. No cause ever released. He died February 27th, exactly two years to the day before McCassland vanished. General McCassland, who just walked out of his

13:47 house with nothing but a sweater and just disappeared. Just absolutely disappeared. Now, William Leonard was not nearly as involved to the degree that Charles McMillan is, but to be fair, nobody is. Intel Alil says, "Why do they keep using that road?" Because it is quite literally the only road in and out of Los Alamos National Lab. Quite literally the only road. So that's why I have this very big deep report. We're not going to go through all of it, but I'm going to tell you a little bit more about Charles McMillan and why I think he's important to the story. Charles F. McMillan was by multiple measures the most authoritative civilian

14:34 voice on American nuclear weapons when he died because he was consulting as a civilian but when he was not a civilian he held the highest of positions and it seemed like these types of guys these high highlevel guys you don't ever retire you don't you can't you're too singular you're too important you take a step back, but you don't retire, dog. You just can't. All right. So, as I said before, he was the 10th director of Los Alamos. Okay? He was the CEO of Los Alamos National Security LLC. From 2017 to 2024, he was a defense science board um for nuclear weapons, shity, and he

15:21 worked at Sandia Labs review committees and nuclear security enterprise integration council. It is such a slo reading these things sometimes. AI and national security advisor. What was that? Was that AI? Another another little uh little overlap here. Telling you guys this might be one story. It might not be two. So Leah's video, she talked about this plutonium surplus and how we're selling it to five private businesses that are essentially all owned by much of the same people and have key figures and players like Sam Alman and Mark Andre and other AI doom

16:06 cultist weirdo who want to kill us all so that we can evolve into cyborgs. And when I say that, I feel I feel how insane that sounds because it is insane to say it, but it's also true. It's also true, man. So, he signed seven annual assessment reports to the president and Congress certifying whether the nuclear weapon stockpile was safe, secure, and reliable. He was elected by his peers to lead the nuclear security enterprise integration council oversight across Los Alamos, Liverour, Sandia, Pentax, Y12.

16:52 He served on the Defense Science Board's permanent subcommittee on nuclear weapons shy. His appointment end date was September 6, 2024, the day he died, because he worked till the day he died. because they don't let you retire when you're this type of dude. So, McMillan directly oversaw the plutonium facility 4 or PF4, the only US facility producing plutonium pits for nuclear warheads. Right now, what did Leah report on? Using surplus plutonium. Where did that plutonium come from? It came from plutonium facility 4. that this man literally ran for 7 years. He managed

17:39 the 2013 PF4 shutdown over criticality safety failures. The facility had a single junior qualified criticality safety engineer. He was initially reluctant but became open to the view that the risks were too high. Yikes. plutonium guys. Anyway, he was Atlanta and he faced the 2014 he had a couple of rough years WIPP radiation release improperly packaged waste from Los Alamos which was kitty litter when it was supposed to be a claybased absorbent. They got the wrong They got kitty litter to pick up nuclear waste in 2014. This is at Los Alamos and

18:24 afterwards it caused a section of Los Alamos to be closed for three years. In 2015, federal inspectors found eight health and safety violations with potential for serious injury or death. An electrical accident injured nine workers. Uh Los Alamos lost over 10 million in performance awards. So just in two years in those two events, he lost almost $70 million in performance rewards because the was not running. Los Alamos missed 29 planned pit tests through 2017. So Los Alamos was supposed to go and they're supposed to make sure that the pits where we make the plutonium was good. And they didn't do that 29 times. This is that'll

19:09 blow us up, dog. H so McMillan his institutional knowledge was uniquely relevant. He knew how much weaponsgrade plutonium existed where it was stored how it was categorized as surplus or required and whether any reclassification was legitimate. His cross complex oversight through the NIC gave him visibility across the entire weapons complex. his stockpile assessment authority gave him standing to challenge any material redesignation. Sounds to me like the dude was pretty important. Anyway, in December 2023, 9 months before his death, he participated in Senator Schumer's ninth bipartisan AI

19:55 insight forum. Why? Why was the dude in charge of our plutonium and all of our nuclear weapons on the committee and involved in all of these things around AI safety? Why was Chuck Schumer, that weasel, doing an AI insight forum as far back as 2014, years and years and years before we ever had AI at a commercial level, years before that discussion, approximately eight years before we were even close. Why? What does AI and nuclear weapons have anything to do with each other? Just just just just make that make sense. Are you guys making sense of that? Tell me in the chat, does that

20:40 make sense to you? I'm not saying that we have this all figured out, but I do think that when you look at something like this and you start digging into this and you start looking at him, I think we see some connections. I think we see some connections. Melissa says, "We're not in Kansas anymore." Godamn right. We're not. So, when I saw this, I went to Leah and I I do not know her at all. Uh, but I've been following her for a few months. I totally respect the work that she's done. Um, I think she's a badass. But she she put in the work. I mean, she she really put

21:26 in the work to put all of these things together. Right. So, a little refresher after I take a sip. On May 26th, the Department of Energy quietly announced it would transfer 20 metric tons of weaponsgrade plutonium, enough for roughly 2,000 nuclear warheads to five private companies. How many nuclear warheads do you think it would take to destroy our planet? They dropped them all at once. I can't imagine. I mean, they dropped two and took out Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Those are major cities. How many major cities are there in the world? 500. Let's let's call it a thousand. It's 20 or 2,000 nuclear warheads. I think that's sufficiently enough to blow up the planet. I think that's enough to blow up the planet. We we're we're literally I mean

22:12 that's some back in the napkin math, but that is enough to blow up the planet. Or at least enough to like destroy our civilization, our our species even. Okay, looks like Scotty's got some math in the in the chat. This is this is way above my pay grade for sure. But back in the nack napkin math, you go how many if one can destroy a city like 80 years ago, what is it like now with the technology? Could one take a city and some surrounding area? How many major cities are there? You know, double that to catch all the rural areas. 2,000 sounds about right. And even if it's not, that is a

22:57 scary amount. And what do they need it for? Are they using plutonium to power the data centers? REAL QUESTION. REAL QUESTION. Scruff went out and he hit the Google form and he says 5 to 600 cities with populations over a million. So 2,000 of these would definitely take us out, dog. And we're selling that much to PRIVATE BUSINESSES. WHY? WHY? WHY ARE WE giving plutonium to the OWNERS OF AI? WHAT THE HELL? Either way, why are we giving private companies owned by billionaires owned by pretty much at this point known cultists who literally think that the end of times are coming, who are a lot

23:43 of them aligned with our greatest ally, our I mean, I'm so grateful for this allyship. our greatest ally who's trying to bring on arm at Getdon to build the third temple and we're giving them all plutonium. Man, sometimes I just got to take a sigh breath for a second because it's a lot. It's a lot to take in. The next day, so that'd be May 27th, 2 days ago, Pam Bondi was added to PCAST, the presidential science advisory board whose members overlap directly with the companies receiving the material. Again, that board, that's AI. Why is AI involved in plutonium sales?

24:28 plutonium sales that are illegal that not only not only our country but the world recognizes as illegal. So Leopiles follows the money through all five companies and found a web of conflicts of interest, revolving doors and foreign entanglements connecting them to PCAST, the DOE and each other. Oaklo's CEO CEO sits on PCAST while its stock surged 59%. That's totally normal. Actually, I say that, but it actually is totally normal. The last 10 years of politics has just been a free-for-all for these leeches on society. And that now it is normal. Now, that's like, of course, it is. Of

25:14 course, the CEO is sitting on the advisory board that's supposed to, you know, oversee what they do and then boom, they go rise up 59% in their stock. Yeah, that's totally normal, guys. But it is now because that's what we are. The United States of corruption. So, one recipient, Exodus Energy, which is one of the five companies, has raised only 2.47 million and has no working reactor. Really, they have 2.47 million in the bank. For a company like that, you're poor. You're not broke, you're poor. You don't even exist. You're probably a shell company. Honestly, you have no infrastructure. You have no anything. And you got a

25:59 couple of cents in the bank. Now, if you were selling a bazooka and I had $247 to my name and no army, but you were an arms dealer with a bazooka, would you sell me the bazooka? Don't think so. Another standard nuclear is a joint venture with a French state company that has an active partnership with Russia's rosterum. So, like Leah was saying in her video, China can't own Tik Tok because it's a national security threat, but a completely Frenchowned business that does business with the Russians who we used to be in a cold war with, even though that was fake as hell. But that's cool. That's cool. That's cool. Israel can own our entire government. And France

26:44 can buy weapons grade plutonium from us and share it with the Russians. We're winning so much. Oh my god. I can't get over how much we're winning. It's It's making my nose itch. That's how angry this gets me that I'm literally scratching my nose cuz it's getting me so heated. BUT THE DOW IS OVER 50K. Let me take Let me take those off. these headphones. I don't want to wear those. We're not watching. I don't need to listen to this. Anyway, this is the outline. This is the structure of corruption. The federal bodies, let me uh let me let me me bump up this zoom guys. Let's look let's look at this. So the federal advisory board

27:29 which is Pcast has Mark Andre and Bondi and the guy who runs Oakllo among others. Conflict of interest totally not. That doesn't exist in this administration. There's the department of energy. You know three of 11 Oakllo directors are DOE alum. So many of these private sector private sector are just the same people. They're just the same people. They're just doing the that the government can't do and they're just doing it for them anyway under the protection of this is a free market. I am all for free market capitalism. I am not for free market corruption. This is free market corruption. just straight up and down nuclear grade plutonium

28:15 to five individual free market companies that are owned by billionaires and tech CEOs and all these corrupt people and there's this connection to all of the missing and dead scientists and particularly some of the ones that I've identified that have never nobody but me talks about and it's all pretty I just saved you an hour and 10 minutes. Now you're up to speed and we're going over how we are because we just gave probably enough plutonium to blow up the world to five separate companies that are owned by some crazy AI

29:03 billionaire cult weirdos. Just like imagine if these dudes got like laid. we probably wouldn't be in this mess. There's five companies. Oaklo, which was started by Sam Olman, who stepped down because he can't have conflict of interest, but he's still totally a part of it. Standard nuclear, Shine Technologies, Flybe Energy, that's a stupid name, and Exodus Energy. And uh let's kind of look at them a little bit, a little bit more in depth. Oaklow 2.5 billion in cash in the last 30 days went up 60% on stock and the CEO sits on PCAST which is the federal governing body the federal advisory board for

29:50 these types of companies the board includes three ex DOE officials KO and M MI m MITER the intersection is the DOE secretary Chris Wright sat on Oakllo's board until February 2025 he now runs the agency signing the plutonian ium contracts. Three of 11 Oaklow directors are DOE alum. That's insanely corrupt. The entire premise that we are selling plutonium to anybody, but especially private businesses is illegal. It is very illegal. And this isn't just illegal in America. This is like worldwide. You can't do this You can't do this But we're doing it. I'll say this. I'll say

30:35 this. You can't tell Donald Trump no. He'll get it done. Much I hate that guy. So, Standard Nuclear founded in 2024 from USNC bankruptcy. Okay. So, they bought them out. This company went bankrupt. Then they were bought out for uh uh two years ago for $28 million. It's a joint venture with Fran Frammatome, which is the French. It's all owned by the French government with active Russian partnership at Rosaton. And their investor is Mark Andre who's also on PCcast and is also a crazy cult dude in Silicon Valley who thinks we're all going to die so that we can become cyborgs. Shine Technologies $240

31:23 million series E. So, I mean, who knows? They probably brought in a billion dollars. If they're at series E at 240, maybe their series A was like 50 million and they going on and then yeah, they have a $2 billion market cap. Okay, I don't know. It's a two billion market cap loss and security suite suit. Sorry. And they're they're integrated with NASA, but they're also mired in legal pro problems. But yeah, legal problems mean nothing to this administration. absolutely nothing to also if you just on you know on a separate screen monitor or on your screen if you just want to go to who's killedthecientist.com and go to

32:09 plutonium it's there as well and you can follow along so fly l ibe fly energy is out of huntsville Alabama you've been following alongsville is rocket city and that is where a lot of anti-gravity research was done. That's where Amy Escridge is from and that's where her and her father had their business that was basically creating anti-gravity. All sorts of government contracts, all sorts of crazy stuff. The CEO is Kirk Sorenson, exNASA Marshall, Teladine Brown Defense, DOE funded Department of Energy. So DOE, it's like, are you seeing this? It's all Pcast and DOE and

32:58 you know billionaire investors. It's it's all the same Exodus Energy founded in 2022 only 2.4 million total in funding. The CEO of is Carl Perez from Alisium which failed and had no commercial reactor. Co-founded with Leh France. So France now has their claws in two of these five companies that is getting enough plutonium to kill us all. A company with 2.47 million and no working reactor is receiving weaponsgrade plutonium co-founded with France's LAG reprocessing facility. Sounds to me like

33:44 a shell. Sounds to me like really France got the double dip on this deal and France is working directly with Russia. So let's look at the map because you guys know me. I like to make mind maps. I like to I'm visual so I like to have these types of things. So right here this is a plutonium program. This is exactly what we're talking about. These are the companies in which they're going to that we talked about. Oaklo, Standard, Shine, Fibe, Fibe, Fibe, and uh, Exodus also working in conjunction with the Department of Energy and PCAST, which is nothing but a way for them to regulate themselves. Who is involved in PCAST?

34:29 Oh, every single one of those companies. Oh, a bunch of billionaires. And Pam Hatchetface Bondi. Weird how that works. You've got Commonwealth Fusion, which was which Nuno, the MIT scientist who was killed, worked with, and they also offshot did an offshoot to the MIT Plasma Science Infusion Center, which was directed by Duno. And they are all connected to Bomb Bob Mumgard, who's on PCcast. See where this is going? Because it just kind of loops round and round. The Mary goes goes round and round. And hey, if goes tits up, they probably

35:15 already paid Trump's family a bunch of money to make sure they never go to jail. Anyway, this this is Anybody else think this is Cuz I think this is You know, I went on and on and did a whole video about anti-gravity and how I think there's a conspiracy around the anti-gravity, how we had paid for all this funding or we paid for all this research. We funded all of this research, the United States government in the 1950s with some of the biggest companies in the world today and none of them could come up with anti-gravity. They all stop, funding goes dry, but then all those companies go on and do insane things in technology and they just stopped going after the most insane technology ever. And I

36:02 thought, man, this is the conspiracy. We got Ning Lee, we got Amy Escridge, we got Neil McCastland, we got all these people, we got all these entities, we got Huntsville, Alabama, and the craziness that's going on down there. And I thought, man, that's the conspiracy. That's the conspiracy. I think there's maybe some other smaller ones, but that's the conspiracy. But now with plutonium, this is in our face. Well, they probably really wanted to do this under the radar. But thanks to independent journalists like the Leafiles, it's in our face now. And that's why I implore all of you, if you have two followers, I don't care if you are interested in this type of stuff, if you if if you have any

36:50 inclination at all to get information out there into the world, I implore you, look into stuff. There's too many things. There are too many things for any one person to look at or any one organization or any 10 organizations. There is too much corruption. We need to have more people out there, more people making content doing stuff. And we've had thousands of people and he's getting out there and he's talking to all those people. And I don't get discouraged because it's still important. This needs to get out there and if you guys can talk about it with other people, you get in invested in this, you start talking about it. You start start investigating, you come to me. Hey Kev, I saw something

37:35 else. Great. Let's talk about it. Let's put it out there. We need to hold these people to account. We need to stop letting these powerful people just do everything under our noses and we need to start calling them out. And hell yes, I'm fired up tonight. I'm fired up tonight, man. How you are you guys fired up? You think I'm crazy or you think I'm on to something? You tell me. I don't know what the solution is. My only solution today is like just oppose data centers. Oppose the data centers, right? I think the data centers are making these guys overextended and their power still comes from money. And I think that

38:20 the data centers might le they might be overleveraged on the data centers. That's what I think. I think those are things that we can actually do is we can protest the data centers. Um I'm not calling for you know anything physical or violent but opposing them working with your city your local government. I mean there are there are towns, cities and even states right now that are putting a moratorum on data centers as they should as they should. So that's something actionable we can do. Um when it comes to this plutonium there's absolutely nothing we can do. What are we going to do? Nothing. There's nothing we can do. But hey, Trump's just making another deal. 5D chess. Anybody else feel like they're winning? You sick of

39:05 winning yet? I for one sick and tired of the winning. I want the winning to stop, honestly.